| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 111 |  
| 0 members and 111 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	| View Poll Results: Should we turn back on the search function |  
	| Yes |      | 17 | 68.00% |  
	| No |      | 3 | 12.00% |  
	| Not unless you can figure out how to disable the "search posts by" feature. |      | 5 | 20.00% |  
	
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  08-20-2009, 06:10 PM | #1 |  
	| Random Syndicate (admin) 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Romantically enfranchised 
					Posts: 14,281
				      | 
				
				enable search
			 
 Apparently it is possible to google the posts on this board.  I think there is a way that I can tell Google not to cache the posts, but I'll have to re-research it.  
 This leads me to ask whether or not the search function should be re-enabled.  It was turned off shortly after we moved to this version of the board because there is a default setting that allows users to search every post an individual has made.  Two or three people voiced concerns about the possibility of outing given that search function, and I turned it off.
 
				__________________"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-21-2009, 05:28 PM | #2 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 I voted yes despite the significant likelihood that the ability to read all of my posts in chronological order will diminish my credibility on the PB and lead to some inaccurate suppositions about my turn-ons, but I am mature enough to realize such problems are non-unique to the availability of searching.  For instance, this is a board on which a certain poster had a sig line for over a year extolling the virtue of something apparently called a "beer shit," yet this self-same poster successfully perpetuates the meme that it is I who am obsessed with matters scatological.  All of this is to say, collaborative deductive reasoning isn't the board's strong suit anyway. |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-21-2009, 05:34 PM | #3 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown 
					Posts: 20,182
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  I voted yes despite the significant likelihood that the ability to read all of my posts in chronological order will diminish my credibility on the PB and lead to some inaccurate suppositions about my turn-ons, but I am mature enough to realize such problems are non-unique to the availability of searching.  For instance, this is a board on which a certain poster had a sig line for over a year extolling the virtue of something apparently called a "beer shit," yet this self-same poster successfully perpetuates the meme that it is I who am obsessed with matters scatological.  All of this is to say, collaborative deductive reasoning isn't the board's strong suit anyway. |  I don't know.  On the one hand, it will make it easier to debunk Hank's "everyone said X" when "Ty said X" meme; on the other hand, if Hank and Slave can't whine about what someone once said on the board, we'd lose a lot of posting, and sometime volume is needed. |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-21-2009, 05:47 PM | #4 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch   is a board on which a certain poster had a sig line for over a year extolling the virtue of something apparently called a "beer shit," yet this self-same poster successfully perpetuates the meme that it is I who am obsessed with matters scatological. |  no surprise which sock it is that remembers this history.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-21-2009, 05:50 PM | #5 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  Apparently it is possible to google the posts on this board.  I think there is a way that I can tell Google not to cache the posts, but I'll have to re-research it.  
 This leads me to ask whether or not the search function should be re-enabled.  It was turned off shortly after we moved to this version of the board because there is a default setting that allows users to search every post an individual has made.  Two or three people voiced concerns about the possibility of outing given that search function, and I turned it off.
 |  I may some day be a famous author. if searching means there is the ability to search by poster name, I think it best that the ability not be provided. 
 
of course, this will benefit other socks who may be the one that becomes famous.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-21-2009, 07:04 PM | #6 |  
	| Wild Rumpus Facilitator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office 
					Posts: 14,167
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  I voted yes despite the significant likelihood that the ability to read all of my posts in chronological order will diminish my credibility on the PB and lead to some inaccurate suppositions about my turn-ons, but I am mature enough to realize such problems are non-unique to the availability of searching.  For instance, this is a board on which a certain poster had a sig line for over a year extolling the virtue of something apparently called a "beer shit," yet this self-same poster successfully perpetuates the meme that it is I who am obsessed with matters scatological.  All of this is to say, collaborative deductive reasoning isn't the board's strong suit anyway. |  I would venture to suggest that "collaborative" anything is not the board's strong suit.
				__________________Send in the evil clowns.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-22-2009, 04:59 PM | #7 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  Apparently it is possible to google the posts on this board.  I think there is a way that I can tell Google not to cache the posts, but I'll have to re-research it.  
 This leads me to ask whether or not the search function should be re-enabled.  It was turned off shortly after we moved to this version of the board because there is a default setting that allows users to search every post an individual has made.  Two or three people voiced concerns about the possibility of outing given that search function, and I turned it off.
 |  I would prefer that the function be enabled, all else equal, because I sometimes remember something vaguely that I or someone else posted and would like to be able to go back and try to find it.  But all else is not equal, if some people are worried about being outed, and notwithstanding my own preferences I would defer to that concern, if it is still held.
 
That said, I thought Adder said that he was only able to find old posts with Google, not recent ones, so the premise behind the question may not be right.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-22-2009, 08:39 PM | #8 |  
	| It's all about me. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Enough about me.  Let's talk about you.  What do you think of me? 
					Posts: 6,004
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  Apparently it is possible to google the posts on this board.  I think there is a way that I can tell Google not to cache the posts, but I'll have to re-research it.  
 This leads me to ask whether or not the search function should be re-enabled.  It was turned off shortly after we moved to this version of the board because there is a default setting that allows users to search every post an individual has made.  Two or three people voiced concerns about the possibility of outing given that search function, and I turned it off.
 |  Either way.  I don't care.
				__________________Always game for a little hand-to-hand chainsaw combat.
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-22-2009, 09:15 PM | #9 |  
	| Classified 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: You Never Know . . . 
					Posts: 4,266
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 All in all -- I'd rather not have the feature.  
 Besides -- this way we can just dismiss the memories of those we disagree with and not be proven wrong.
 
 S_A_M
 
				__________________"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
 
 Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-22-2009, 09:18 PM | #10 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Flyover land 
					Posts: 19,042
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 I wanted to see where I was mentioned while gone and was disappointed to find it disabled. 
				__________________I'm using lipstick again.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-24-2009, 10:33 AM | #11 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Appalaichan Trail 
					Posts: 6,201
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 I vote enable. |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-24-2009, 10:58 AM | #12 |  
	| usually superfluous 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: the comfy chair 
					Posts: 434
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 Do I get a vote?  I post so infrequently that I don't really have a skin in the game.  If I get a vote, I vote enable. |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-24-2009, 09:14 PM | #13 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 I vote enable, but perhaps there are ways to limit the searches somewhat?
 For example, no results more than a year old?  Or different lengths for different boards (1 year politics, 90 days FB)?
 
 I have no idea how configurable the search feature is, but while generally I like search I'm not fully sold on the idea that it's a good idea for a search to return all Burger posts (for example).
 
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-24-2009, 09:22 PM | #14 |  
	| Flaired. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Out with Lumbergh. 
					Posts: 9,954
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  I vote enable, but perhaps there are ways to limit the searches somewhat?
 For example, no results more than a year old?  Or different lengths for different boards (1 year politics, 90 days FB)?
 
 I have no idea how configurable the search feature is, but while generally I like search I'm not fully sold on the idea that it's a good idea for a search to return all Burger posts (for example).
 |  Because someone out there might have time to read through all 15,000 of them? God help the person with that time and inclination.
 
I'm an enabler. Or, uh, a fan of enabling. Or whatever.
				__________________See you later, decorator.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  08-24-2009, 10:11 PM | #15 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				Re: enable search
			 
 I have traditionally been against it, but given that this is a less high profile environment than infirmation used to be, I am ambivalent. |  
	|   |   |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |