Offering constructive criticism to the social cripples in our midst since early 2005.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Objective indisputable facts are Bill Clinton is a liar. His lies may be limited or not, but he has shown and admitted that he will lie, seemingly solely to protect his own ass. NPI.

Since you are repeating the unsubstantiated claims, I will ask you Shifter, could you please cite me to the objective proven undisputed lies that Juanita has told, about her rape or otherwise?

Thanks,

Yes. She says she was raped by Bill Clinton.



Objective indisputable facts show that W is a liar. Maybe he raped JB too.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Spanky
During the 2000 Bush campaign I was a guest on a bunch of radio talk shows around the country. Most of them were in the morning, midwestern and eastern time, so I had to either stay up until three in the morning or get up real early. I was supposed to talk about the Bush campaign. I did at least sixty. On every show, callers would bring up these Clinton conspiracies, and the host would also be completely familiar with them. You would not believe the amount of theories out there. On these shows people were convinced that I talked to Bush daily and was going to be a key part of the administration. So they had to tell me the theory and all the evidence in support so I could get the information to Bush so the proper investigation could be conducted once in office. I just didn't buy any of it. I had my assistant look into many of them (just so I did not look like a comoplete idiot), and in the end, the evidence was always questionable.

I wonder why there were so many about the Clintons when other politicians who provoked similiarly strong feelings from the opposite side of the aisle, Nixon, Reagan, W and even Ted Kennedy do not have this level of inuendo surrounding them.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I wonder why there were so many about the Clintons when other politicians who provoked similiarly strong feelings from the opposite side of the aisle, Nixon, Reagan, W and even Ted Kennedy do not have this level of inuendo surrounding them.

There was plenty of innuendo regarding Nixon. Much of it was proven true and ceased being innuendo.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by taxwonk
When I said it, he was running for re-election. I was discussing my feelings regarding him gaining a second term. His having won a second term, you will note I haven't expressed the thought since.

You can twist the hell out of any statement you want by person who isn't here to set the record straight. Don't try to do it with me, or you'll wind up stepping on your dick.

Your obssession with Hillary Clinton is on a par with the Kennedy conspiracy theorists and the folk who still spot Elvis working at the 7-11. You have nothing. Exhaustive investigation over the course of several years has failed to turn up a scintilla of evidence to support you, and yet you persist. Fine, that's your thing, you're entitled to it.

But keep me out of it. I have enough people on this joint thinking I'm borderline batshit without getting smeared with your particular brand o' crazy.

Without your post to review we are both tilting at windmills here. If you say you don't want him dead I will take you at your word. Likewise, ftr, I again state I have no death wish against Hillary and would request that you and others not extrapolate my honest criticism of the Clintons into an inference of the same.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Is your point that people do not properly appreciate that the bombings kill people? Maybe if we call them "killing homicide bombings", or "deathly homicide bombing attacks."

How about a catchy acronym?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Yes. She says she was raped by Bill Clinton.



Objective indisputable facts show that W is a liar. Maybe he raped JB too.

So the answer is no. Its sad to see how pathetic you have become Shift since your expulsion from the insurgency.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
There was plenty of innuendo regarding Nixon. Much of it was proven true and ceased being innuendo.

Not at a comparable level.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Is your point that people do not properly appreciate that the bombings kill people? Maybe if we call them "killing homicide bombings", or "deathly homicide bombing attacks."

Just so long as we don't resort to calling them by their preferred name, the word in their own language that means something ridiculous, like "divine wind."

If we did something that UnAmerican and AntiPatriotic, the War On Terror (tm) would be over before you could say "where the heck is Osama, anyway?"

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I wonder why there were so many about the Clintons when other politicians who provoked similiarly strong feelings from the opposite side of the aisle, Nixon, Reagan, W and even Ted Kennedy do not have this level of inuendo surrounding them.

The only historical parallel that comes to mind is the hatred that the Right had for FDR and Eleanor.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
So the answer is no. Its sad to see how pathetic you have become Shift since your expulsion from the insurgency.

I just thought the "homicide bomber" label was stupid.

[dtb]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter

Objective indisputable facts show that W is a liar. Maybe he raped JB too.

His own brother?!? Eeeew.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Not Bob
The only historical parallel that comes to mind is the hatred that the Right had for FDR and Eleanor.

How old are you?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Is your point that people do not properly appreciate that the bombings kill people? Maybe if we call them "killing homicide bombings", or "deathly homicide bombing attacks."

Shouldn't we look to the root cause, and recognize our own culpability?

American Induced bombings might be best.

this will be in keeping with the liberal plan for a mea culpa at the WTC site. Would you please run this idea up the flagpole?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Shouldn't we look to the root cause, and recognize our own culpability?

American Induced bombings might be best.

this will be in keeping with the liberal plan for a mea culpa at the WTC site. Would you please run this idea up the flagpole?

Don't be such an egghead. All we need is resolve. Resolve, and more tax cuts for the rich.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Don't be such an egghead. All we need is resolve. Resolve, and more tax cuts for the rich.

Head in sand?

As long as our office buildings keep being built to include corporate coffe shops in the ground floor lobbys, the freedom fighters will keep blowing those office buildings up.

Free range coffee only!