Making Baby Jesus Cry

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Penske_Account

Look at the above piece of sub-human filth, I wonder if the average kool-aid intoxicated Dean disciple of the left came upon a situation where they found both President George W. Bush and the ululating Palestinian whore above trapped in the e coli stew of New Orleans. Only one can be saved and the other would die. Which one would the leftie save?

I am betting the terror loving bee-yotch.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Spanky
Wasn't a movie made about her life, and Judge Reinholds sister from Fast Times played Dorothy?

Yes - Jennifer Jason Leigh played her in Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
Does the same apply to you, or are there different rules?

Hank's harmless since his juan sock was neutered. Humour him.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Hank's harmless since his juan sock was neutered. Humour him.

That explains the penis envy.

[Penske_Account]

The Democrats, meanwhile, are the party of emotive know-nothings, the go-to guys for soap-operatic sobbing and righteous histrionics. You can understand why the 24-hour cable-news networks love the Dems. Just stick a camera in front of New Orleans's Mayor Nagin: "To those who would criticise, where the hell were you?" he roared the other day. "Where the hell were you?" In a town you're not the mayor of, happily.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
That explains the penis envy.

From what I heard, that was a one time thing. Much like Danny Bonaduce, Hank didn't realize "she" was a trannie.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
From what I heard, that was a one time thing. Much like Danny Bonaduce, Hank didn't realize "she" was a trannie.

Oh, I see - it's all coming together now.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Never happen. There is no acceptance of any responsibility on the left. Its all morally relative.

I accept responsibilitity for everything that the entire left has done through 8:24 p.m., PST, on September 13, 2005. Through then, no more bellyaching from you conservatives -- it's all my responsibility. After that, they're on their own again.

[baltassoc]

Penske:

Your boy is off message again.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by baltassoc
Penske:

Your boy is off message again.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/st...568467,00.html

Do you think this might present a happy compromise to the whole "stem-cell" debate?

• The beauty products from the skin of executed Chinese prisoners.
  
  A Chinese cosmetics company is using skin harvested from the corpses of executed convicts to develop beauty products for sale in Europe, an investigation by the Guardian has discovered.
  Agents for the firm have told would-be customers it is developing collagen for lip and wrinkle treatments from skin taken from prisoners after they have been shot. The agents say some of the company's products have been exported to the UK, and that the use of skin from condemned convicts is "traditional" and nothing to "make such a big fuss about".

P. the Lord wouldn't object to taking cells from executed guys, would he?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/st...568467,00.html

Do you think this might present a happy compromise to the whole "stem-cell" debate?

• The beauty products from the skin of executed Chinese prisoners.
  
  A Chinese cosmetics company is using skin harvested from the corpses of executed convicts to develop beauty products for sale in Europe, an investigation by the Guardian has discovered.
  Agents for the firm have told would-be customers it is developing collagen for lip and wrinkle treatments from skin taken from prisoners after they have been shot. The agents say some of the company's products have been exported to the UK, and that the use of skin from condemned convicts is "traditional" and nothing to "make such a big fuss about".

P. the Lord wouldn't object to taking cells from executed guys, would he?

I think back a long time ago they used to make beauty treatments from fats rendered from executed convicts. However I may have gleaned this from some fiction book. OTOH, usually if they include shit that weird in historical fiction, it's based in fact. But then, I may be misremembering altogether.

Atticus and DS probably know.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
You're avatar seems confusingly similar to mine.

If you worked in IP, you would know to never make this particular statement until you had a firm understanding of priority.

[baltassoc]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
If you worked in IP, you would know to never make this particular statement until you had a firm understanding of priority.

I'm liking you today. This is amazingly apropos to my research project for the day.

[nononono]

Originally posted by baltassoc
Penske:

Your boy is off message again.

Put another way: "Wow, can you believe an elected official actually having the balls and the character to admit there were failures on his watch and accepting responsibility for them?" Despite the editorializing in the story itself, what comes through loud and clear is the President is the only one stepping up.

[Captain]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
You're probably familiar with Akhil Amar. If not, read up.

BTW, while in principle that's an interesting approach, you'd have to eliminate most sovereign immunity for the cops to make it have any teeth.

On sovereign immunity, other than the limited sovereign immunity that is set out in the 11th amendment, where do you view sovereignty, and any powers relating to it, as arising? Sovereign immunity is not mentioned in the constitution itself. And what powers might be included in this concept of "Sovereignty".

You complained yesterday about the vagueness of the 9th amendment rights reserved to the people. Does the vagueness of some extra-constitutional powers (one of which is "Sovereign immunity" but I see an implied and broader "sovereign" set of powers as soon as you do that) being reserved to the government bother you? I'm not sure where you came down on the right to privacy, but I find it much easier to understand a concept of a right to privacy from a quick skim through the Federalist Papers than I do the concept of "sovereign powers" beyond those enumerated in the constitution.