LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 142
0 members and 142 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2005, 10:07 PM   #2566
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
Hello, I have a technical question

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
I guess I don't pay attention enough to these things, but the FBA is the "actual" FBA, is it not?

ETA: Let me make it clear that I am aware that "Anonymous Fashionista" is a Penske (or Hank) sock. I'm not a complete idiot.
I don't sock. Or at least not sos you don't all know about 5 posts in who it is.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:09 PM   #2567
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Hello, I have a technical question

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I don't sock. Or at least not sos you don't all know about 5 posts in who it is.
That is in part a lie. Also, I am not anon and don't sock anymore.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:11 PM   #2568
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
Hello, I have a technical question

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
That is in part a lie. Also, I am not anon and don't sock anymore.
Thanks for getting my back.

The shit Penske and I admit to in the open, why would we go anon?

Maybe he means the birthday wish guy? that's nfh, ss one of that ilk.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:12 PM   #2569
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Hello, I have a technical question

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Thanks for getting my back.

The shit Penske and I admit to in the open, why what would it take to go anon? Maybe he means the birthday wish guy? nfh, ss one of that ilk.
de nada y dos.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:12 PM   #2570
spookyfish
Rageaholic
 
spookyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
Hmm, I am still not with you. . Going into today, they had the same record. Now the Yanks are one up wth one to go, so the Yanks would need two to clinch Bc if they lost, they are back to being tied, no? The Red Sox needed three wins to clinch and the Yanks need two. If the Yanks lose tomorrow, Its Red Sox-Yanks on Monday, right? What am I missing? How can the Yanks and the Red Sox not have had the same record going into today?
I'll type more slowly.

If the Red Sox win tomorrow, they will have an identical record to the Yankees, which would mean there was a tie.

Major League Baseball has these things called tie-breakers, in case of just such an eventuality between teams in the same division.

The first tie breaker is the "head-to-head" record.

After looking it up, counting tomorrow's game, the Yankees and Red Sox will have played each other 19 times.

With New York's win today, they have won 10 games against the Red Sox this season.

Even if the Red Sox win tomorrow, they will have no more than 9 wins against the Yankees this year.

So, even if we were to assume the Sox win tomorrow, the Yankees win the tie breaker with a record of 10-9 in head-to-head meetings, so they clinched the division today.

Got it now?
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
spookyfish is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:16 PM   #2571
spookyfish
Rageaholic
 
spookyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
OK, I thought I understood this

Since I double-posted, I'll answer your additional question here.

ETA: What Cleveland does only makes a difference in who wins the Wild Card berth.

Besides the division winners, Baseball allows one other team (the remaining team with the best record, regardless of division) a playoff berth.

The Sox are playing now for the wild card.

Right now, the Sox' record is one game better than Cleveland's. If the Sox win tomorrow, they're in no matter what Cleveland does.

If they lose, and Cleveland wins, Boston and Cleveland have the same record, and will play a one game playoff (technically the first post-season game, I guess) to see who gets the right to go on as the fourth team in the playoffs.

__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.

Last edited by spookyfish; 10-01-2005 at 10:19 PM..
spookyfish is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:18 PM   #2572
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
I'll type more slowly.

If the Red Sox win tomorrow, they will have an identical record to the Yankees, which would mean there was a tie.

Major League Baseball has these things called tie-breakers, in case of just such an eventuality between teams in the same division.

The first tie breaker is the "head-to-head" record.

After looking it up, counting tomorrow's game, the Yankees and Red Sox will have played each other 19 times.

With New York's win today, they have won 10 games against the Red Sox this season.

Even if the Red Sox win tomorrow, they will have no more than 9 wins against the Yankees this year.

So, even if we were to assume the Sox win tomorrow, the Yankees win the tie breaker with a record of 10-9 in head-to-head meetings, so they clinched the division today.

Got it now?
but that is a meaningless win, right? There will be a playoff, and even though it would be in NY, I think that was decided yesteray and from a coin flip. The "clinching "is meaningless- that was what confused good ole Paigow.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:20 PM   #2573
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
I'll type more slowly.

If the Red Sox win tomorrow, they will have an identical record to the Yankees, which would mean there was a tie.

Major League Baseball has these things called tie-breakers, in case of just such an eventuality between teams in the same division.

The first tie breaker is the "head-to-head" record.

After looking it up, counting tomorrow's game, the Yankees and Red Sox will have played each other 19 times.

With New York's win today, they have won 10 games against the Red Sox this season.

Even if the Red Sox win tomorrow, they will have no more than 9 wins against the Yankees this year.

So, even if we were to assume the Sox win tomorrow, the Yankees win the tie breaker with a record of 10-9 in head-to-head meetings, so they clinched the division today.

Got it now?
Is there any provision for a win to count double? A super-duper win, sts. Then it could be 10-10, no?

eta:

[true story] When I was child, in my youth, my hood played a regular summer season of whiffle ball, in addition to all of the kids playing little league ball. At my whiffle ball field, ie my parent's backyard, in the middle of what would have been centerfield there was a faux-decorative well house (it covered the artesian well cover-this was the country). If you hit the whiffle ball and it landed in the well house on the fly (which was tough as the opening was about 2' x 2' and there was a roof over it) it was an automatic grandslam (regardless of runners on base). IN 5 or 6 seasons there were only 3 of these ever. We made a plaque. It was big tyme shite in our hood. [/true story]

Does MLB have anything like that going on?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:20 PM   #2574
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
Since I double-posted, I'll answer your additional question here.

ETA: What Cleveland does only makes a difference in who wins the Wild Card berth.

Besides the division winners, Baseball allows one other team (the remaining team with the best record, regardless of division) a playoff berth.

The Sox are playing now for the wild card.

If they win tomorrow, they're in no matter what Cleveland does.

If they lose, and Cleveland wins, Boston and Cleveland have the same record, and will play a one game playoff (technically the first post-season game, I guess) to see who gets the right to go on as the fourth team in the playoffs.
Coltrane is out on Rush Street, so I'll take his proxy. He would appreciate if you were specific when you say "sox." at least for the next week until the White Sox get knocked out.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:21 PM   #2575
spookyfish
Rageaholic
 
spookyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
but that is a meaningless win, right? There will be a playoff, and even though it would be in NY, I think that was decided yesteray and from a coin flip. The "clinching "is meaningless- that was what confused good ole Paigow.
I know you're a Tigers fan, but please tell me you're joking.
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
spookyfish is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:22 PM   #2576
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
I know you're a Tigers fan, but please tell me you're joking.
thelast time I folowed baseball there was no wild card. But there will be a playoff, won't there is the Sox win tomorrow?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:24 PM   #2577
spookyfish
Rageaholic
 
spookyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Is there any provision for a win to count double? A super-duper win, sts. Then it could be 10-10, no?
Only in Florida.
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
spookyfish is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:28 PM   #2578
spookyfish
Rageaholic
 
spookyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
thelast time I folowed baseball there was no wild card. But there will be a playoff, won't there is the Sox win tomorrow?
Only if Cleveland wins too (for the wild card), otherwise no.

ETA: I assume, for Coltrane's benefit, that you mean the Red Sox.
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.

Last edited by spookyfish; 10-01-2005 at 10:31 PM..
spookyfish is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:30 PM   #2579
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
Only if Cleveland wins too (for the wild card), otherwise no.
They used to not settle a season on a tiebreaker. I'm shocked. They play 162 games, why not play 1 more?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:35 PM   #2580
spookyfish
Rageaholic
 
spookyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
They used to not settle a season on a tiebreaker. I'm shocked. They play 162 games, why not play 1 more?
I know, but it may have something to do with the fact that they played fewer games in a season and/or had fewer divisions. While I am certain MLB would looooove to have the additional revenue which comes with playing tie-breakers, I don't think anyone wants to be playing baseball into November.
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
spookyfish is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.