LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 634
0 members and 634 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2005, 04:14 PM   #2221
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
These Bozos Don't understand Bush...

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think short of credible allegations of child molestation, SO beating or putting pubical hairs on co-workers coke cans, Luttig, McConnell, Jones, Clement (sorry Ty), and Alito are all confirmable.
I agree.

eta: I think McConnell would be a powerhouse on the court, though I tend to disagree with some of what he thinks.

Quote:
JRB would be a fight, but a damn interesting one. Owens would get dinged in all likelihood.
Have heard that some Republicans oppose them behind the scenes, and so I suspect they would not be nominated for fear of losing the vote. The White House should be able to count votes as well as you and me, if they bother to do so.

Quote:
Generally I think you are right, but Gonzalez is more qualified for a seat than this lady and he is Bush's people. Or how about Ashcroft?
Maybe Gonzalez didn't want the job. Attorney General is not a bad gig, and he just got there. Ashcroft is not one of Bush's people.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar

Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 10-07-2005 at 04:16 PM..
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:21 PM   #2222
Secret_Agent_Man
Classified
 
Secret_Agent_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
These Bozos Don't understand Bush...

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Ashcroft is not one of Bush's people.
Plus -- The base would like it, but talk about a nuclear war over a nominee!

S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."

Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
Secret_Agent_Man is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:23 PM   #2223
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
These Bozos Don't understand Bush...

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Plus -- The base would like it, but talk about a nuclear war over a nominee!

S_A_M
I knew he wasn't exactly a Bushie but the fight would be worth the price of admission.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:39 PM   #2224
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
BOARD POLL

Will Miers be confirmed, yes or no?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:40 PM   #2225
andViolins
(Moderator) oHIo
 
andViolins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: there
Posts: 1,049
BOARD POLL

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Will Miers be confirmed, yes or no?
No. She will withdraw her name from consideration.

aV
andViolins is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:42 PM   #2226
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Calling Penske Out

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Lying under oath is absolutely wrong. When you will admit that? Putting aside God's law, as an atty, don't you believe in the rule of law?
I didn't say perjury wasn't wrong. As for whether or not it is an absolute wrong, I believe in very few absolutes. But that wasn't the point of my question. I had asked you if lying is an absolute wrong. You said that lying under oath was. All I'm trying to do now is clarify whether or not you believe lying when not under oath is an absolute wrong or not. What is your answer?
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:44 PM   #2227
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Calling Penske Out

Am I to take it from this post that you believe God spoke to Bush?
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:46 PM   #2228
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Calling Penske Out

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
I didn't say perjury wasn't wrong. As for whether or not it is an absolute wrong, I believe in very few absolutes. But that wasn't the point of my question. I had asked you if lying is an absolute wrong. You said that lying under oath was. All I'm trying to do now is clarify whether or not you believe lying when not under oath is an absolute wrong or not. What is your answer?
Why would you not think perjury is wrong? Why can't the left admit its wrong? Is perjury legal in IL?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:47 PM   #2229
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Calling Penske Out

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Am I to take it from this post that you believe God spoke to Bush?
I believe intelligent design is a powerful force.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:47 PM   #2230
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Calling Penske out

This must be a terrible blow to you. First, we agreed that God decreed killing to be an absolute Wrong. Now, presumably, for I see no other reason for you posting this, you believe God has told Bush that it's alright to kill.

Apparently, God is a moral relativist. Does this mean that you are now going to abandon absolutism?
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:48 PM   #2231
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
BOARD POLL

Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
No. She will withdraw her name from consideration.

aV
Thanks.

The current tally is:

Yes: 0

No (or effectively no): 1
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:50 PM   #2232
SlaveNoMore
Consigliere
 
SlaveNoMore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
BOARD POLL

Quote:
Penske_Account
Will Miers be confirmed, yes or no?
(c) she won't be put up for a vote
SlaveNoMore is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:51 PM   #2233
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Calling Penske out

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
This must be a terrible blow to you. First, we agreed that God decreed killing to be an absolute Wrong. Now, presumably, for I see no other reason for you posting this, you believe God has told Bush that it's alright to kill.

Apparently, God is a moral relativist. Does this mean that you are now going to abandon absolutism?
God is not a moral relativist. He has absolute power. He makes the rules. It's sad that you would denigrate his authority with such mockery.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 04:53 PM   #2234
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Arrow BOARD POLL

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
(c) she won't be put up for a vote
OKay, I am counting that as no.

If she doesn't get to a vote then she won't be confirmed.

Yes: 0

No: 2
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:06 PM   #2235
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
BOARD POLL

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
OKay, I am counting that as no.

If she doesn't get to a vote then she won't be confirmed.
can't he just make a recess appointment?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 PM.