Waiting for Fitzgerald

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
FWIW, as a personal aside, fyi, I don't like the use of the word "partner" and have started boycotting it. It's too businessy. I am going with "lover" from here on out. More personal.

It's good you are becoming more honest.

From what we know of your interpersonal relationships they could hardly be called partnerships. Conning fat girls into unwinnable bets on running races is hardly the act of a fiduciary.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
FWIW, as a personal aside, fyi, I don't like the use of the word "partner" and have started boycotting it. It's too businessy. I am going with "lover" from here on out. More personal.

Indeed. Have you ever said lover out loud, seriously, in reference to another person without laughing, at least on the inside?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
It's good you are becoming more honest.

From what we know of your interpersonal relationships they could hardly be called partnerships. Conning fat girls into unwinnable bets on running races is hardly the act of a fiduciary.

My current lover's grade schooler is running a "kid's marathon" race later this year. So in return for unmentionable consideration from my lover, I have agreed to train the kid. We went to the track yesterday and in an effourt to validate my earlier anecdote I spotted the kid a half mile in a mile race. I ran a 6:03 mile ( figured I'd take it easy on the kid). The kid ran a 6:45 half. Once again, mmmmmmm3587 is proven wrong. What a jackarse.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
Indeed. Have you ever said lover out loud, seriously, in reference to another person without laughing, at least on the inside?

I'm going to a cocktail party, sts, npi, this coming Saturday and I am going to break it out as the newest addition to my lexicon. I'll let you know how it goes it over.


Do I get points for this undertaking?

[bilmore]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I know what they're up to, I just don't think it's clear from what they've written.

Here's the best source if you're really looking: http://www.tlc.state.tx.us/pubsconam...analyses05.pdf

What you're seeing isn't the actual language, but what gets put on the ballot (which, I must say, is a screwy way to have people vote on an amendment - I would think you'd have to put up the actual words you're changing from and to, but, hey, what do I know?) and the actual language is clearer.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I'm going to a cocktail party, sts, npi, this coming Saturday and I am going to break it our as the newest addition to my lexicon. I'll let you know how it goes it over.


Do I get points for this undertaking?

We need a reckoning, to get all points up-to-date. I lost a K while you were away, but got something for something else. I really am not the person to keep track.

But to answer, perhaps. I will need details to evaluate.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by baltassoc
I seem to recall Apple doing so in Austin,

They make Macs. Effin' loonies.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
We need a reckoning, to get all points up-to-date. I lost a K while you were away, but got something for something else. I really am not the person to keep track.

But to answer, perhaps. I will need details to evaluate.

Smashing. I will have my secretary log on tomorrow and do a cross board reconcilliation.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Smashing. I will have my secretary log on tomorrow and do a cross board reconcilliation.

Superfabulous. Have her/him cc: me. Oh, and notarized, please.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
What am I technically?

I think he's referring to your libertarian tendencies, which do you no good at all, as no one grants spousal or partnerial or even lovarian benefits because of them.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
Superfabulous. Have her/him cc: me. Oh, and notarized, please.

BOC. She is a notary.

[nononono]

Originally posted by bilmore
I think he's referring to your libertarian tendencies, which do you no good at all, as no one grants spousal or partnerial or even lovarian benefits because of them.

Lovarian...I don't know if that works. It sounds like, well, ovaries, which may or may not be appropriate. Perhaps you'll need to go to a Latin derivation, or the ever-lyrical "loverly."

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
BOC. She is a notary.

But not everything a notary does is notarized. Just need to be sure. Dotting, crossing, etc.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
Perhaps you'll need to go to........the ever-lyrical "loverly."

Ding ding ding!!!!!!

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Ding ding ding!!!!!!

Point?