Politics As Usual

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The Dems will hold off the nomination as long as possible, and once it becomes clear that JFK is unelectable, they will pull a "Torricelli" and substitute Senator Rodham at the last minute.

Thus throwing a wrench into the works and preventing the GOP barrage reminding the country of what a shrew she is and how successful she is with cattle futures.

The way you guys fantasize about this makes me want to reach for a copy of the DSM-IV.

[The Larry Davis Experience]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I've already had 2 wins on this one!

I hear one of those wins was a card trick.

[ltl/fb]

bilmore:

Also turns out the fingerprints were on the handle of one of the suitcases blown apart by explosives.

Not Me:

And he is a muslim himself. 'Nuff said.




And it wasn't his fingerprint:http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/24/na...PORTLA.html?hp

But, you know, hey, I'm sure they will reimburse him for any legal fees he's incurred.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Senator Rodham

cattle futures

Double Samuel.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Also, you can't get the facts straight.

I come to this board to have pleasant discourse. If you continue to attack me personally, i'm taking my act to tucker Max. you aren't holding a monopoly Ty.

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by Not Me
We have the luxury of keeping part of our society Soft only if we keep most of it Hard....showing signs of Hardening...harsh and unforgiving....Hard...provocative.[/list]

That is so hot.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Wrong. No sitting president has ever had a convention drag into September, and the 2004 GOP convention will be later than any for an incumbent in the last 3+ decades.

Dunno the answer, but isn't the more relevant question the spread in weeks between the two conventions, not the actual date? If the challenger was only two weeks before the incumbent, yet an early date, your point about the late dates is kind of irrelevant.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Dunno the answer, but isn't the more relevant question the spread in weeks between the two conventions, not the actual date? If the challenger was only two weeks before the incumbent, yet an early date, your point about the late dates is kind of irrelevant.

Ty's a nut. do you really think there's a difference between September 2 and August 31 as to 9/11 references?

Conventions start/end on the same days, I think Thursday-monday. but across 8 years that means the dates change. It works out to 9/2, but its effectively the same as Clinton's.

edit: monday-thursday actually, but the point stands

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Ty's a nut.

POTD.

[SlaveNoMore]

Diane_Keaton
That is so hot.

Please change your avatar immediately. It ruins the mental image.

[SlaveNoMore]

Shape Shifter
Double Samuel.

Call me obtuse, but what the flying fuck are you talking about?

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Please change your avatar immediately. It ruins the mental image.

You'd prefer Dianne Keaton?

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Call me obtuse, but what the flying fuck are you talking about?

See here:

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...5808#post95808


and here:

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...muel#post95883

If you're nice to MR, he may teach you about the search function.

[SlaveNoMore]

Shape Shifter
If you're nice to MR, he may teach you about the search function.

Why bother. I just got you to do it for me.

PS - And it wasn't even funny the first time.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Why bother. I just got you to do it for me.

PS - And it wasn't even funny the first time.

You're welcome.

PS - Neither were the Clinton jokes. Got anything from the Truman administration? I hear they were a riot, and most people have forgotten them by now.