LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 118
0 members and 118 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-28-2004, 04:49 PM   #11
Atticus Grinch
Hello, Dum-Dum.
 
Atticus Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
The Analysis From a Dissident Catholic Democrat

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Can you give me a coherent, non-religious analysis of how to distinguish between a minor and an adult for purposes of laws against statutory rape and pedophilia? Do you think there is a non-religious basis for jailing practicing NAMBLA types?
Sure. Decades of observed developmental consequences of early sexual activity have shown that pre-pubescent sexual contact results in other negative social behaviors, such as depression, drug use, promiscuity, a tendency toward seeking sexual contact with a new generation of minors, etc. Take a poll of the sexual offenders, and you'll find that they were abused as kids.

As for statutory rape, I don't think the justification was ever religious. The laws against extramarital sex accomplish the same religious goals. But I would justify it today on the ground that 16-year-olds who have sex with 24-year-olds tend to become a burden on society by having children out of wedlock and dropping out of school. Oh, and the fact that we don't want 24-year-olds to get shot by angry parents of 16-year-olds, which is what would happen if statutory rape were decriminalized.
Atticus Grinch is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM.