LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 126
0 members and 126 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-30-2004, 01:22 AM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
things proven today

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Okay in his 20 years he can point to one time where the rule worked. He "had dozens" of others cases that would have been a fight. Is it not posssible that the efficiency and incentives mentioned in the article might be better?

Have you ever spoken to even one environmental compliance officer at a major company? they do not want to violate, they want to comply. violation is too expensive.

I ask you Coltrane, is it not possible that the old man you quote is locked in the wars of the past, and a dinosaur?
Actually, I run into cases of companies not caring about compliance relatively frequently. Just like the IRS, the EPA hasn't sufficient resources to monitor compliance adequately, and they play the audit lottery.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.