LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 608
0 members and 608 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-29-2005, 06:16 PM   #11
SlaveNoMore
Consigliere
 
SlaveNoMore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
More tyranny I like

Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
Read out of context, sure. But the proposition is that local governments are captive to certain special interests, and are making bad policy as a result. If you were to say that local governments do a bad job of policing, the remedy is to hire better policemen, not to get rid of criminals' rights.

I'm still waiting for a conservative to defend the idea that a local government should be able to take land to run its own shopping mall and parking lot, but shouldn't be able to take the land and privatize the operation.
"...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation"

I do think the states are better suited to make these determinations (and to set "just" compensation), but the overly broad interpretation of the word "use" that seems to issue from Kelo is troubling.
SlaveNoMore is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.