LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 335
0 members and 335 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-20-2005, 05:56 PM   #11
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
Here it comes...

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
This is non-sensical. I am not advocating a retroactive application and actually not advocating a federal application. I think the proper place for the decisions over what is legal and not to be made is in the legislature and specifically the state legislature.

Oh, so sorry. You would prefer that, should the situation arise again, they would not have such a choice, or at least that it not be legal


Quote:
I suppose then they would have a choice to fly down to CA and get the procedure. Sort of like when I was 18 and CT raised the drinking age to 19 and I had to drive to NY to drink legally.
Yes, the question of your ability to drink at age 18 is perfectly comparable to the heart-wrenching decision your friends went through.

Perhaps if they were carrots you would be sensitive to them.
Sidd Finch is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.