|
CAFTA
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Exactly, because we all now know, after being educated by the democrats, that the only justification for invading a country is if they have WMDs. If a dictator is trampling on the human right of their citizens or actually engaged in Genocide, it is still immoral to remove them. The use of might is an immoral act unless there are WMDs.
|
Just a note, Spanky: No one actually thinks that mere possession of WMD is a causus belli, or however you spell it. And you are one of the very few people I know who believes that it is OK to invade foreign countries simply to bring them free markets.
Here is a WaPo piece (by David Ignatius -- hardly a lefty) about Bolton's efforts to sound the alarm about Cuba's non-existent WMD. Just so it's clear that I what I was referring to.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 08-01-2005 at 02:20 AM..
|
Threaded Mode