LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 393
0 members and 393 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-17-2006, 01:06 AM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
No. You are fully capable of clicking the surgeon general report and reading it for yourself. (hint: go to chapter seven http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/librar...t/chapter7.pdf) And the way that the studies are usually weighed, it's in terms of your increased risk compared to the control population. So a non-smoker in Japan who lives with a smoker has a 1.9 increased chance of getting lung cancer than she would have had she not lived with the smoker, that risk is readjusted to 1.3 when other factors (such as diet) are taken into account.
"Relative Risk

Definition: Relative risk is a measure of how much a particular risk factor (say cigarette smoking) influences the risk of a specified outcome (say, death by age 70)

For example, a relative risk of 2 associated with a risk factor means that persons with that risk factor have a 2 fold increased risk of having a specified outcome compared to persons without that risk factor."

Isn't a relative risk of 2 considered insignificant?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 AM.