LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 436
0 members and 436 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-07-2007, 05:44 PM   #11
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
RT's dilemma

Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
Really? 300 bucks per treatment to prevent X number of future cancer cases (that might cost big bucks to treat)?

Would the legislature pass it?
I think the numbers are such that it might not be so clear. Like, only a few strains out of many are shown to cause cervical cancer, and those strains will only remain in the bodies and potentially cause cancer in a very small number of women who contract that strain. HPV of all strains resolves itself in most people, meaning it just goes away by action of the immune system. So I think RT's point about allocation of resources is quite valid.

Given that my mother died of cervical cancer, I am not opposed to the vaccine, but I don't think it addresses a public health crisis to render it mandatory.
robustpuppy is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM.