LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 281
1 members and 280 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-18-2007, 03:21 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Who is arguing to the contrary today, or are you rehashing arguments from the 80s? I haven't heard much debate on this of late, but the debate in the 80s was mostly over MAD versus other strategies.
Are you kidding? Ever since the end of the cold war there has been constant calls for the end of funding for SDI (including on this board). Why do you think Ty and Adder are debating this? Why does every time an SDI test fails it is posted on this board as a "see I told you so..."?

You would think this would be one area every rational human being in the United State could agree on, but it is not. Like I said, my theory is that since SDI was originally proposed by Reagan a large swath of Democrats and liberals will always be against the idea, no mater how much sense it makes, simply because of who proposed it.

Last edited by Spanky; 02-18-2007 at 03:24 PM..
Spanky is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.