LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,014
0 members and 2,014 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-07-2007, 03:53 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,148
for Thurgreed

http://www.juvenilejusticefyi.com/hi...e_justice.html

this seems a somewhat unbiased summary of how juvenile laws changed over time. it seems some changes intended to "protect" kids may have actually moved them closer to being exposed to adult sentences.

originally (early 1800s), if you were over 7, you went to jail- there weren't really 2 systems. then a juvenile system was set up, that was mostly all rehabilitation and no punishment (or at least intended to be). then in the 60s the Sup Ct. ruled that juveniles were entitled to all rights afforded adults in the criminal justice system. 1 dissenter (Fortas) wondered if the Court wasn't forcing the juvenile defendants closer to the adult system.

After that paranoid states legislators enact laws that let kids be tried as adults. I guess the prosecutors are saying some kid's actions are so bad that the reasons for the separate system don't apply because the kid ain't going to possibly be "fixed."
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.