LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-13-2021, 11:37 AM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
Partisan bullshit. The story is a pretty tragic series of ignoring shit and horrible co-incidi, but at lower levels. I have seen nothing about Snyder himself (but I don't have access to the emails). Dunno what they will charge him with.

Almost think this is a desperate attempt to overcome the negative feelings the gov, and by extension all D's, are attracting from people of all political beliefs relative to her covid response.
Looks that way.

1. It's state level (B Team);
2. It's a new version of previously dismissed charges as to several Defendants;
3. Facts are really old -- significantly decreases dependability/veracity of witnesses

But one question I have is, why did they dismiss without prejudice and refile rather than just issue superseding indictments? That makes the whole thing look pretty flawed. I don't know about you, but if I'm on a jury and someone tells me the prosecution previously dropped the charges, I'm thinking there's something lacking here, and the defendants charged twice are being unfairly forced to pay for counsel and go through the process twice.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.