» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 532 |
0 members and 532 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
06-24-2004, 12:24 AM
|
#11
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
|
I'm concerned
Quote:
Originally posted by the Spartan
Actually more seriously, per my quote, Hillary said if what later became known as true was true than we should be concerned. I was, at that time, but it never really seemed like they, the Clintons, and their apologists in the liberal media, acknowledged the validity of that concern when the truth came to bear. Why in the hypothetical was it a matter of concern, but in reality its something to be sloughed off with the tag lines "nothing to see here more along" "just sex" blah blah blah.
Either, from a "we the people" perspective, it was something to be concerned about or it wasn't. The world's self-proclaimed smartest woman and co-president said it was a matter of concern. And yet Clinton writes in his book that it was, at least in part, a product of Starr's vendetta and the impeachment was unwarranted. When are we going to get a sincere apology for his urination on our the constitutional office of the Presidency? When ty, when?
Of course if W did something like this there wouldn't be any concern.
|
Translation: In all seriousness, I can't leave the Clintons alone because the Hillary voices in my head tell me not to.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.