LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 380
0 members and 380 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-18-2004, 02:50 PM   #11
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
Hank, you da man!

Quote:
Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
By antiwar, do you mean anti all war? By the way you phrase the question, it seems you think it's hypocritical for anyone opposed to war to vote for anyone who would be willing to go to war. Since all electable presidential candidates have to be willing to go to war, this would mean that all antiwar folks are pretty much disqualified from having an impact on any presidential election, sicne they would be stuck voting for the Feng Shui party every time. That seems odd.
This is exactly the sort of nuance that we don't need in this time of national danger. Give me Hank's clarity instead.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.