LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 367
0 members and 367 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-10-2004, 04:23 PM   #11
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
It's been a decade, and we're locked and loaded. Look out, Bambi.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I think it's reasonable -- and in keeping with the original intent of the framers -- to say that you have a right to bear infantry arms if you are actually serving in the infantry -- the National Guard, say, or some kind militia. Other forms of "reasonable regulation" would seem to have less basis in what the framers of the Second Amendment were thinking about.

Most gunnies disagree with your view, and my application of it.
Does anyone here have a problem with a *reasonable registered concealed-carry law?

Hello


Reasonable as in no violent criminals or psychologically disturbed people need apply.
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.