Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
This is rich. Lemme get this straight. The incumbent can attack the challenger with all sorts of lowball tactics, engaging in the sleaziest of smear campaigns and personally attacking the challenger, but the challenger can't attack the incumbent back with similar smear which is BASED ON THE INCUMBENT'S RECORD? Are you seriously saying that?
|
It used to be that politics stopped at the water's edge. That is not the case anymore and I think we are worse off for it. READ my post, I didn't say the challenger couldn't challenge, and if done in the right manner, critism can be helpful. But its the hyperbolic houghing that is dismaying. "Bush Lied" - are you fucking kidding me. You should have a helluva a lot more evidence than they had if you are going to make this claim in war time on a war issue.
Nice Lloyd Bentsen by the way.
Threaded Mode