LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 505
0 members and 505 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-05-2004, 01:03 AM   #11
NotFromHere
No title
 
NotFromHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 8,092
Settle a bet with a feisty coworker.

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I can't reconcile this. If a semicolon is the appropriate punctuation, it's a run-on sentence, no?

My feisty coworker was telling me that it's not a run-on because there is an implied "because." I told em that I was unaware of the "implied because" doctrine that excuses run-on sentences. Em is otherwise very bright (hi, em!) but, bitch, please --- "implied because"?
Atticus. I did not know that you worked at Starbucks. I'll have a double tall non-fat latte.

Isn't there also an inplied "be" before careful, with an understood you? Wouldn't that then be 2 sentences and not a runon?
__________________
Ritchie Incognito is a shitbag.
NotFromHere is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.