LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,673
0 members and 2,673 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-30-2004, 08:40 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Follow-Up

Quote:
Originally posted by Santorum
And even if there is an element of redressing old wrongs, so what. Doesn't the state have an interest in telling targets of hate crimes that old wrongs will no longer be tolerated? To take the most obvious example, a cross burning on a black family's lawn is a symbol of hate because it communicates to the family that there are people out there that hate the family. It is also a reminder -- and is placed there as a reminder -- that not so long ago, the government countenanced cross burning, to say nothing of lynching, as well as other types of murders and other forms of terrorism directed at blacks. Shouldn't the government be able to tell black families that its "past wrong" of ignoring or participating in such crimes is a thing of the past, and that the government is now on the family's side?
I think there are separate laws for cross burning anyway. I thought we were talking about when you kill someone is it just murder or is there a second crime tacked on to make it more serious.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.