LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 654
0 members and 654 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-16-2004, 04:49 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Maybe There's Hope

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
That is encouraging, but I'm concerned that the FCC chose to state that it only regulates indecency on mediums "indiscriminately available to children".
The FCC is going to lose it all if it persists in the massive fines against broadcasters. Powell needs to worry not about expanding the scope of indecency regulation, but retaining any authority whatsoever. It boggles my mind as to why he'd push the issue to the front burner, given his desire to censor. Better to issue small fines, that companies won't challenge, and cause the nets to self-censor.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.