Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No, you overread. I do it all the time outside the office. People will routinely stop me and say, "Stop cross examining me. You know what I mean."
Your distinction is very literal and very well crafted. Its also unecessary. You understood what I meant when I said "semantics" back three posts ago.
|
I assumed what you meant was that you and RT just had a semantic difference because, to you, turning any random event into an adventure or a farce or a drama, perhaps by highlighting meaningless details, but still only saying things that are right on the money, constitutes "embellishment."
I was just pointing out that you were wrong.