LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > Regional Forums > SF/SV

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 432
0 members and 432 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-24-2005, 04:26 AM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Civil War question

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
They did use rifles (the muzzle-loading muskets were a species of rifle), and also repeating ones at that. The Henry rifle was one lever-action repeater that saw service in the War Between the States.* The Spencer was another. Their higher cost and relatively exotic ordnance kept them from being as widely issued as the muzzle-loading rifles, which in turn were only six-year-old technology at the start of the war and therefore relatively exotic.

A.K.A. The War Among the States.
The repeating rifle seems so superior to the muzzle loading rifle that I find it amazing that more of an effort wasn't made to supply everyone with repeating rifles. A jump from a muzzle-loading rifle seems like to me the jump from a sword to a musket. It would seem to me that ten soldiers with repeating rifles would easily beat a hundred soliders with muzzle loading rifles. A repeating rifle could get off five rounds in a couple of seconds where a muzzle loading musket firing five rounds would take a couple of minutes. In combat that difference in time would be tactically invaluable. The difference in my mind must be greater than reality.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.