Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
How was Hussein going to get those WMDs to our shore? He was a fucking despot. He KILLED fundamentalists for years.
DESPOTS ARE INTERESTED IN SELF PRESERVATION. We could have kept him controlled forever. As longs as he stayed in scotch and whores, he'd never do more than make overblown threats. The Iraqi army turned out to be a fucking joke. His entire control appratus was a fabrication. The guy had a ragtag group of lackeys backing him up and scaaring the shit out of the citizenry to stay in charge. WE KILLED AN ENEMY WE HAD UNDER OUR THUMB IN FAVOR OF A NEW INSTABLE QUAGMIRE WHERE A TRUE NUCLEAR DISAATER COULD OCCUR SOMEDAY.
Ultimately, the Saudis are our biggest problem. But your dipshit hero is too busy sucking them off to do anything about the millions of out of wwork angry young Saudis. that regime will fall someday, and when it does, thaat place will become THE scariest motherfucking problem zone we'll ever know.
|
We controlled him? We could have controlled him forever? On what planet? We had cornered ourselves into a box. There were two no fly zones that were created, that eventually would lead to a pilot being shot down ending up under Saddams control. In addition, those fly zones, and the enforcement had tied up a good deal of our forces in Saudi Arabia with no foreseeable timetable for them to get out. We looked totally weak because we had let Saddam Hussein kick out the inspectors (it was only W's saber rattling that got them back in). Saddam Hussein had completely violated the peace treaty that ended the gulf war and it didn't look like he was going to get overthrown any time soon. In addition, his people were in total misery, caused by the sanctions and his brutal regime. We couldn't lift the sanctions while he was flouting the treaty. We had a guy who had control of a lot of money and a large country who had it in for us and would not think twice about taking out New York or Chicago. Without his help, Al Queda did quite a bit of damage so if the two of them ever hooked up - giving Al Queda to the entire access of the Iraqi state - lord know what they could have accomplished. We had the choice of giving up and not enforcing the treaty or going in and taking him out. The only practical option was taking him out. I am just glad we had a President who had the Cajones to make the call. I believe in the problem solver, not the person that says - lets just let things alone and hopefully they will fix themselves. That is what led to WWII. Iraq was not going to fix itself. I have a lot of problems with the Bush administration, but the fact that they made a decision and stuck by it through thick and think eclipses everything else they do. He didn't let the international community or the liberals take his eye off the ball. Once we started the military buildup Saddam Hussein was milking the international community trying to delay things so we would get into Ramadan and then the summer months. Leaving our entire army over there to stew. He stayed focused and didn't let the prime military situation get screwed up over delays for "consultations" and any other such BS that was not going to lead to anything. Once you give a deadline you stick by it. He did what needed to be done no matter what the consequences. I'll take that any day over a politician who makes foreign policy decisions based on the latest polling. I don't care if Iraq turns into a quagmire for the next forty years. We had to take the risk and thank God we had W. there to make the right call.
Threaded Mode