Quote:
sebastian_dangerfield
Well, this is where we split. The gordian knot. Me... I tend to like the women I know. And that tends to compel me to value them above the rights of whatever might be groing in them. Call that callous, but the line has to be drawn somewhere.
|
And maybe the majority of the population of Wyoming also tend to like to the women they know. And they think they are responsible. And realize and trust that women and men are responsible enough to understand that sex can lead to children.
Children, that cry and pee, and before you realize it, are looking for a cell phone and an allowance. And realize that children - growing in them - are a bit different than the mole on your neck growing an unsightly hair at the speed of light - also growing in them.
And maybe the people of Wyoming put it to a vote, and the people who feel that way win out.
Quote:
And I come down as pro-woman. Thats really what we're talking about here, isn't it?
|
No, it's not. And you're much smarterthan that to be spewing such bogus platitudes from NOW's brochures.
Quote:
The way this issue has been drawn, one is either pro-woman or pro-unborn.
|
Um, no. Not fucking at all.
It's been drawn as Anti-Woman/ Pro-Choice or Pro-Death/Anti-Unborn.
And why?? Because it was determined by judicial fiat, and not by the legislature. The silent majority had no say, and the violent fringe at both ends have stolen the discourse.
Quote:
We should start using those terms. It'd keep a lot of hyopcrites from getting laid. Try to explain how you're "pro-unborn" while you're trying to get in any self respecting progressive woman's pants.
|
I've done okay with my Anti-Roe stance.
Quote:
PS: My indpendent research, conducted over nearly two decades of trying to get in women's pants, indicates that the women who call themselves pro-life are not the women one wants to fuck.
|
So you ignore the MILF spam?