LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 583
0 members and 583 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-17-2005, 03:04 AM   #11
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
Civil War

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
So let me gets this straight. If this constitution brings peace but women women's rights are restricted then Iraq is worse off than it was under Saddam? That is just absurd.
I didn't say that (is there an echo in here?), and the question is absurdly hypothetical because if and when they reach some consensus on a constitution, it's not bringing peace, anymore than the elections did. Remember those glorious inkprints on everyone's thumbs?

Quote:
No one had any rights under Saddam Hussein. So any rights are a step in a positive direction.
No one has any rights now, either, in important senses that you seem to be ignoring. It's not like the government has any real capacity to enforce the law. The police are targets. At least there was a measure of order under Hussein. I'm not defending him, but it's unclear to me why you are so convinced that the war zone that we've created is a huge step up.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM.