» Site Navigation |
|
|
09-16-2005, 07:10 PM
|
#11
|
Serenity Now
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
|
Just for Fun
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Not necessarily, although 18 years certainly was selected in light of the current number of nine, and teh stagger wouldn't work so well if the number were larger.
What if the amendment to Article III simply said "The judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good Behaviour, except that Congress shall have the power to fix a maximum term of service for judges of the supreme Court, . . .
The staggering will never be perfect because inevitably a justice will die before the term is up.
Anyway, Congress could set the length at whatever it pleases. (one could also include in the amendment a provision "maximum term of service, but not less than 18 years, for judges
|
We've talked about this idea before, and it's a good one, although I wouldn't want to leave the time period in Congress' hands.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.