LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 619
1 members and 618 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-19-2005, 04:17 PM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Penalizing the Cops

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
These two are blatant double taxations. Why do want more tax? How about less tax and more efficient application?

As a side note: technically I am against alimony as a concept, so, since we are in a la la land anyway, let's assume alimony is outlawed in the Flat Tax Reform Bill.
Dividends are only double taxation if you accept the argument that they should not be taxed at both the corporate and shareholder level. If corporations can no longer deduct wages, why should they, in effect, be able to deduct dividends? Either everything gets taxed in each taxpayer's hands, or nothing gets taxed in each taxpayer's hands.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.