LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,258
0 members and 1,258 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-07-2006, 11:45 AM   #11
baltassoc
Caustically Optimistic
 
baltassoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City That Reads
Posts: 2,385
More Republicans for states' rights

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
But the real reason behind the push to federalize these rules is not the cost of complying with different regulatory schemes. It's a desire to reduce regulations, period. They are not interested in uniformity, they are interested in lowering the bar.
I think this is unfair. Clearly, sometimes it's about lowering the bar. Or rationalizing the bar. But not always. I know that in one area in which I work (security breach notification laws) the impacted industries really do just want uniformity above all else, although certainly wouldn't mind if they could pare back some of the loopier state laws (i.e., Illinois, which is extremely overzealous in its notification - you know you've overshot your mark when businesses are holding out California as a better model of balancing interests).
__________________
torture is wrong.
baltassoc is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 AM.