LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 832
0 members and 832 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-08-2006, 09:24 PM   #11
SlaveNoMore
Consigliere
 
SlaveNoMore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
I was just posing a hypothetical.

Here's another hypothetical. Suppose that the President's speechwriters propose the language I quoted, and his policy people say, "You can't say that -- it's not true." So someone suggests, "well, we know the British got the same bogus report that we did, so why don't we say that 'Great Britain has learned' the other stuff." That gives us some sort of plausible deniability if it comes out that we know it's not true." I would say that that is misleading, akin to lying. I would further submit that if President Clinton had tried a ruse like that in a deposition concerning alleged sexual abuse, you would be ready to convict him for perjury on that basis alone.
I guess it depends upon what your definition of "is" is.
SlaveNoMore is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.