All Hank, all the time.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
she sits on a board of an organization that gives major money, other people's money, to the ACLU= she supports what the ACLU does= she has no business hearing its cases. she is more than donating her money, she is effectively a fund raiser.

So scalia should recuse from every case brought by a church? Or the Bush admin. Just supporting what someone does seems to be a pretty weak basis on which to recuse. It would require judges to recuse themselves on anything on which they've formed an opinion.

And, btw, is there any evidence she personally approved the donations to the ACLU? Perhaps she voted against it. Or it's decided by someone else within the organization who does not report to her.