LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 444
0 members and 444 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-30-2006, 04:37 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This is batshit crazy:
  • Over 10 years, the companies hired are projected to collect overdue taxes totaling $1.4 billion, $330 million of which the companies keep as fees. According to the IRS' own estimates, over those same 10 years, the agency could collect $87 billion in unpaid taxes at a cost of just under $300 million — if allowed to hire sufficient personnel. In total, utilizing the private sector instead of augmenting IRS personnel would leave in the hands of delinquent taxpayers more than $85 billion owed to the federal government.

Spanky, is there someone you can call about this?
The numbers in that paragraph make no sense. They say it's 8 times less efficient (3c v. 23c) but will collect 80x the revenue for the same cost?

Second, I suspect this is applees to oranges. The collection rates now are for larger delinquencies, whic of course are cheaper to collect. Furthermore, I suspect that they aren't taking into account the compromises they give (i.e., we'll settle for half). Turning it over to a private collection agency, for the small stuff, with compromise authority, will naturally lead to lower collections.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.