LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 836
0 members and 836 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-27-2006, 03:24 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
(From the other board, on Burger's well-aimed orders

Hyperbole. "Anywhere near"? The funding the bill "was sold on"? This wasn't a funding bill - it imposed requirements - requirements that the education systems should have been meeting anyway - and then it provided some funds to ameliorate the pain. In the grand scheme of things, the feds don't provide local education funding, even when they announce that there are standards that all schools must live up to, and some schools aren't, so here's what we're gonna do. The "missing" funds under NCLB constitute a very, very small portion of total ed funding.

I'm still amazed that liberals can be so abusive towards this bill - it's the classic "enforce national standards for the benefit of the poor" type of law, but the vitriol suggests, to me, that the NEA carries way more weight (in instances where they are complately conflicted) than is healthy. This was a good bill, but you'd think Bush and Kennedy imposed it to steal books from kids.
It sounds like you think the bill is an unmitigated success - so why aren't the Rs running on it?
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.