LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 345
0 members and 345 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-21-2006, 09:28 PM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Stop This. Everybody. Now

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Faced with the utter stupidity and irrationality of your arguments you decide to criticize my use of a verb form? Usually when a pathetic poster is faced with the reality of their lame argument they usually lash back by accusing the other poster (that has exposed the wanting logic of their position) of being overexcited, or commenting on a misspelling, grammar or mathematical mistake made by the said poster. But focusing on the use of a verb form; that has to be a new low, even for you. I think that qualifies you as the most pathetic poster on the board.

In any event, firing an employee because they used the passive voice is quite an unexpected irrational and absurd statement, even coming from you. I don't think I have ever heard of that before. The subordinates in your office must love having such erratic and bizarre rules of conduct to comply with. I would never fire someone for using a verb form I didn't like, however, if they demonstrated that they were as irrational, emotional and as unable to differentiate between issues (or to understand what issues and facts are relevant) as you, I would tell them they just have no place in a law office.
You sir, are a jackass. You are guilty of arrogance beyond measure. You constantly engage in sollipsism, semantic torture, and pure leaps of logic to come up with genuinely ridiculous positions. You do everything that you accuse other posters of in spades. I tire of you.

Now, to get to the business at hand. The post which led Spanky to get his knickers in a twist was a rant. A good old-fashioned Sebbyesque rant; a jump-off if you will. It is a tactic which enjoys a long and distinguished tenure here, one that extends to the dark and misty days long before we were plagued by the utter inanity that is Spanky and the acerbic, yet delightfully bracing wit that is Ms. No.

During the course of a long and painful stretch in the WC, examining a small puncture wound and attempting to soak off adhesive from places that I truly hope none of you ever need to have adhesive used, I happened to glance at the current issue of GQ. I was somewhat chargined to find that the Editor had devoted his monthly space to precisely the same topic as my rant.

At the risk of losing some credibility on the originality front, I direct you to that editorial, as Mr. Nelson expressed the same thought in a more organized and coherent fashion than I.

And with that explanation, Spanky, you pustulent, stinking, chancre of a pox on the art of logical and intelligent discourse, I banish you forever more to the land of fu, where I trust you and the other maroons will be very happy together.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 AM.