LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 519
0 members and 519 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-17-2007, 06:35 PM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Man hands

Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I think that's a statement against interest, and I only think that because I watch a lot of Law and Order.
It is a statement against interest, as defined in the FRE, although the despcription uses language essentially the same as that quoted by Penske.

The distinction dtb is noting is the exclusion of a formal party admission, i.e., in a pleading or a Request to Admit, which is not hearsay at all, and furthermore, cannot be impeached by the party against whom it is invoked.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.