LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 271
0 members and 271 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-28-2007, 07:49 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Short term memory

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
How the F is it not relevant? Clearly they serve at the Executive's will.

Clinton canned 49 (probably exceptional) attorneys for no reason other than that he felt like it. Pity.

If Bush wants to fire his own (probably) guys, so be it.

There's no story in this story.
There are two stories here:

Mid-term firings are pretty rare. The first story here is that Bush can't even get his own appointees to do his dirty work any more. Poor George.

The other story is that the Republicans managed to change the law so mid-term appointees won't need Senate confirmation. Just one last little dirty trick for the old tricksters - just like the mid-night appointments that still tarnish John Adams' name.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.