Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
I guess this is hardly a surprise given the near univerals inability to actually read any meaning into all of the words of the Second Amendment. But these two passages in the article seem inconsistent:
|
Is that any worse than reading words into the constitution that are not there? Where in the constitution are the time, place and manner restrictons on speech? Or put another way, why have the courts been inable comprehend 'Congress . . . shall meak no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech?
Threaded Mode