LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 348
0 members and 348 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-23-2007, 01:04 PM   #11
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
The wedging will begin shortly.

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Under that theory, it should be taxed at the difference between the corporate tax rate and the individual tax rate. The income has already been taxed at the corporate level, right?

Depends on whether the income is based on dividends or is from selling interests (as in the private equity example). If the latter, no, there hasn't been any tax at the corporate level.

Even in the dividend example, I wonder if income was fully taxed at the corporate level. I seem to remember a lot of complaints that corps were issuing dividends and yet their various write-offs, shelters, etc. helped them avoid any taxes in the first place.

If we were truly concerned about double taxation, and not just about giving extra breaks to passive income, then I would think the right approach would be to tax dividends to the shareholder just like any other income, but to allow the corporation to deduct any dividends (or, at least, any dividends to shareholders subject to US income tax) from their taxable income.
__________________
Where are my elephants?!?!
Sidd Finch is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 PM.