LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 288
2 members and 286 guests
Adder, Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-12-2007, 05:36 PM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
there's no "r" in "spoliation"

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Are you saying US Attorneys are cleary not "inferior" officers whose appointment may be entrusted solely to the president? And, if you are, are you saying that if Congress enacts a law that is unconstitutional, the President is obligated to ignore it?
Actually, I was just trying to move the discourse past the "he can fire them"/"he can't fire them" stage to the "here's why" phase. Because the current discussion leads me to feel, like Hank, "so what?"
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.