LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 313
0 members and 313 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-01-2007, 03:12 PM   #11
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,160
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Indeed, because those companies that create those things pay no taxes at all. The govt just gives them money to make stuff for us.

And of course Apple and Windows, as we both know, were the products of govt think tanks.

...

Now, tell me how it built the internet. You're nothing if not predictable.
Come on now, you are being intentionally dense. The modern computer, and the internet, is the result of military research. Sure, Apple and Tandy and IBM brought it to a different setting, but they can hardly claim not to have benefited from the earlier government spending.

As for drugs, well, you are mostly just wrong. Nearly all drugs begin with government funded research. Only after they show some promise there do they end up with private companies, who end up with patents that make them rich.

ETA:

Quote:
Removing the govt from the equation would not impede development of anything one bit. It takes with one hand and gives back with the other, creating administrative costs and little more along the way.
Tell that to the makers of Tang. Or the marketers of AZT as an AIDS drug.

Last edited by Adder; 05-01-2007 at 03:20 PM..
Adder is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.