LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 193
0 members and 193 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-11-2007, 10:53 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
Fourth Circuit bitchslap

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Are you basing your little fantasy
Okay, you choose to ignore the LAX bomber. I understand why you would because it kills your whole position.
Quote:
on the notion that Homeland Security will know better how to protect us than a judge, or is it all about the quantum of evidence required to convict someone?
Judges intentionally let people they know are murderers go free based upon procedural glitches, so yes. Judges and juries can convict people if there is BARD evidence of a crime. The problem is that anything we can convict most of them of is probably a misdemenor. I understand your point, and I understand that you want the judge to let the murdered go. Most of America would rather both those things get fixed.

Quote:
As for the fascist thing, I said "smacks of." So rest easy. Your trains aren't running on time yet.
dude I repeat a blitzkreig on your ass about 5 times a week, you just look at the world from Uncle junior's eyes so you don't see it.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.