LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 345
2 members and 343 guests
Hank Chinaski, Replaced_Texan
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-27-2007, 04:28 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
If You Can't Beat Em, Pass a Law

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Why should our radio airwaves be highjacked by the 2 party system that has highjacked our government? In practice, what would happen is that there would be a DEM view and a GOP view, and at some point these would become proxies (even more so than they currently are) for the 2 parties. On top of that, the fairness doctrine is obsolete in that there are now so many different distribution channels for ideas, such that the fact that one medium may be "controlled" by one ideology (e.g., radio) does not prohibit other views from being distributed via other mediums (e.g., print).
From what I can see, at an editorial level we're down to two or three terrestrial radio networks, and now have four viable television networks, and three or four significant print media conglomerates. The internet's the wild west, but the traditional media is very concentrated and getting more so. Telling them its a good idea to have diverse voices on public airwaves is worth thinking about, given that we're licensing them that limited space.

But, more than anything else, I'd really like to see Fox handle this one. It would just be so entertaining.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.