LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 648
0 members and 648 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-10-2003, 04:38 PM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
BBC2USA

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I was just thinking about this this morning -- that fat looks better tan, but in general, large people cover more of their bodies with clothes.* If the body is all covered up, it can't get tan.** An exacerbating factor is that the paler and more fish-belly-like your fat is, the more you want to cover it up.

Quite the conundrum.

*I do not need to hear about the latest trip to Kmart and how everyone saw a large person in a miniskirt and midriff-baring shirt. Everyone on here bitches that people who are too large to wear such thing shouldn't wear them, so for the sake of argument we are only considering larger people who abide by that rule.

**No, I don't want to hear about self-tanner either. Using self-tanner is a pain in the ass even if you aren't large, and it would seem much harder to get to body parts if they were larger.

Edited to put in slightly more colorful language.
One can only imagine your private hell.

Thank God.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM.