LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 374
0 members and 374 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-09-2007, 04:45 PM   #11
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
shouldn't a tele company get to trust the President? i mean if he broke the law the by telling a company that it wasn't, it seems to me you should be impeaching him or something.
No. And, fwiw, I assume that it wasn't George Bush personally calling each CEO, asking for help.

If I can step out of character for a moment -- I represented a business entity that was one of several victims of a criminal. State and federal law enforcement authorities investigated, and asked for copies of documents that were (like phone conversations) protected by federal statute. We said, love to help, send us a subpoena. They went ballistic, bullied, blustered, etc., and finally sent a subpoena.

Anyway, my point is that if my client had given the documents without the complusion of the subpoena, they would have been the one in violation of the statute, not the state and fed law enforcement types who would have been in receipt of the records.

Interesting discussion here about the topic http://www.overlawyered.com/2007/10/...com_immun.html
Not Bob is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.