LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 805
0 members and 805 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-25-2003, 11:49 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Fucking telemarketers and Fucking Judges

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Nike might argue with that.
They might pay $1.5m not to be bothered, though.

What's recockulous about this decision is that it rests on discrimination between charitable solitications and commercial solicitation. Now, why did the FTC make that distinction? Because its statute says it can't go after non-profit entities. So, can't the FTC say: okay, charities aren't exempted, but then simply not go after them because they know they would have no authority?
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.