LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 558
1 members and 557 guests
Tyrone Slothrop
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-12-2003, 06:03 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
immigration

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb


Though, how min wage laws apply to farm workers is something I'm only pretty sure about and not something I'm entirely sure about, and I'd truly love it if someone who actually for-sure knows would bust out and say so.
I don't know one way or the other. Either they're subsidized as compared to other businesses by being expressly exempt or they're subsidized by being implicitly exempt, because there's no enforcement of the rules. Take your pick, my point's the same either way: farmers have a source of labor at below-market rates. That's a subsidy, if not a directly fiscal one. Why should farms be exempt, but not auto cos., steel cos., coal cos., etc.? It causes a misallocation of resources towards farming, that does not increase (US) societal welfare). If the concern is national security (we need domestic supplies of grain), then give farmers a fixed amount of money each year (per acre) simply to produce.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.