LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,399
0 members and 1,399 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-20-2020, 09:05 AM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
"No doubt," eh? Which sentence in their letter suggests to you that they had Portland in mind?
I did not state that the Harper's Letter addressed Portland. I stated that its signatories no doubt have commented negatively on Portland. As Portland occured after the letter, those comments or pieces would come after the letter. Unless you're aware of a time machine to which journalists have access.

Quote:
"A thoughtful fashion," huh? Are they pensively rubbing their chin to look good, or is it the complete failure to address the specific facts of any particular situation that leaves you thinking that?
They are addressing the issue rationally, dispassionately, as professionals in their industry were once compelled to do. Even one of my favorites, Thompson, who was openly biased, sought to distance himself from emotive pleas and yelling. When he attacked, he did so from a position of observer, mocker, not that of aggrieved victim whose "personal truth" may not be challenged.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.